Nerdwriter: What is the Treachery of Images? (Magritte)
-
Ever find yourself looking at a painting and wonder: What exactly am I supposed to feel?
-
Certain paintings seem unwilling to move even an inch in your direction, leaving you with a massive void to fill with unanchored interpretation
-
-
Magritte moves more than an inch in the direction of the viewer, this painting comes in all the way
-
The painting speaks in a language we can understand: Language itself
-
Ceci n'est pas une pipe: This is not a pipe
-
The painting talks. It engages.
-
-
-
Magritte:
-
Famous and most lasting of surrealistic artists
-
Considered himself not a painter but a thinker who used images to express himself
-
Well-versed in philosophical style from Plato to Foucaut used this to investigate ideas
-
to confuse and invoke mystery
-
What we want is always behind the thing we see.
-
The obstruction can never be removed completely because it is not in the object but in vision and thought and perception (!)*
-
-
-
-
The Treachery of Images
-
obvious at first: Image of a pipe and then a reminder that it is not a pipe
-
We can infer the rest : it's not a pipe, it's a representation of the pipe
-
Representations are not the real thing, they only resemble the real thing
-
Seems obvious, but if someone shows me a painting of an apple and asks me what it is, I am very likely to say, "it's an apple"
-
This little accident of language is not an accident at all
-
-
-
-
-
Language
-
For many hundreds of years humans have supposed that language and reality had an organic relationship: that the names of things arose out of the things themselves
-
A tree is in fact a tree ; a pipe is really a pipe
-
The Gospel according to St. John: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."
-
-
Ferdinand deSaussure - famous linguist
-
A thing and its name have a totally arbitrary relationship
-
We don't really know things but only access their shadow through language, in which everything has a meaning in the context of the system (!)*
-
Magritte saw that the old wrong-headed ways of thinking about language (trusting the Word implicitly) were still hiding in the way we thought and talked about images
-
Realistic painting plays on resemblance and resemblance suggests a hierarchy
-
The image of a pipe represents that it points outside of language, to the thing in itself.
-
The falseness of this claim is what inspired abstract artists to move beyond resemblance into a field in which painting had no referent in reality as such
-
-
Magritte, on the other hand, makes this point using the false premises of resemblance, and shatters them from within
-
-
-
-
-
The visual secret dependence on language is laid bare in the Treachery of Images, indeed that dependance is The Treachery of Images
-
The image and the sentence laid out like a page from a botanical textbook, begging to be connected
-
Why should we connect them?
-
Why should the sentence and the image refer to one another?
-
How do we know the word "this" points upward?
-
The pronoun, resemblance and the name all make that connection inevitable
-
That inevitability that's made real in every aspect of our lives
-
We go about our days confident that everything we see can be said, and that the images we say can be seen.
-
If you've ever used the phrase "You had to be there" you know that these are two realities that do no overlap in the way we act like they do
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
[image of a pipe] is not a pipe, yes; but [pipe] is not a pipe either
-
The sentence scrawled in its cute schoolboy cursive is actually a contradiction, a contradiction that pulls the whole painting apart at its seams and makes it utter nonsense.
-
-
What's more forceful?:
-
Not moving an inch in the direction of the viewer?
-
Or moving a question all the way into the center of the viewer's mind, that on the slightest prodding and examination, implodes.
-
*(emphasis added)